Showdown on Washam Potts project tonight?

Published On: February 3, 2020By

Feb. 3. Dave Vieser. An updated proposal for 27 townhomes on a 6.83 acre plot off Washam Potts Road is scheduled for a final public hearing tonight Feb. 3 at the Cornelius Town Board.

A significant amount of opposition has surfaced about the plan, including sharp criticism from Commissioner Jim Duke and former Commissioner Dave Gilroy.

The site currently has one single-family home.

Duke has come out strongly against the project:

“In my years on the Town Board of Commissioners I have rarely taken issue with the work of the Planning Department, but on the issue of inserting 27 townhomes along a narrow slip of property between two residential subdivisions, I take exception.  The large group of neighbors

DUKE

opposing the project have been both thoughtful and respectful of the process. These stakeholders oppose what is technically adequate under current Town rules, but wholly inappropriate for both adjoining communities.  Twenty-seven townhomes being shoe-horned in between those residential properties fails the “sniff” test in my view.  The Town Board is the last line of protection for these concerned folks.  I am reminded regularly that these folks are our bosses and have entrusted us to protect their interests from profit driven developers. This property could easily support at least 18 single-family homes and would be consistent with adjoining properties.” —Commissioner Jim Duke

DAVE GILROY

“This is a real unforced error,” Gilroy told Cornelius Today.

“The entire neighborhood opposes this uncalled-for rezoning with only one purpose—to increase residential density clearly beyond what is good for the community,” Gilroy said.

Under the proposal, Blue Heel Development LLC would build 27 single-family townhomes on approximately 6.8 acres.

At the December meeting, Deputy Town Manager Wayne Herron noted that North Carolina is a property rights state and land owners have the right to develop property as long as it is in accordance with local zoning and land use regulations.

He also noted that under state law the town can’t approve or reject a proposal based solely on the development of the land with townhomes rather than single-family homes.

Susan Irvin, an attorney representing the builder Matt Gallagher, said that, based on discussions with the neighbors a buffer zone will be built between the townhomes and the adjoining property. She also said that 27 townhomes would actually generate less traffic than 20 private homes.

Despite those comments, many residents pleaded with the commissioners to hold off on approving the application.

“We purchased our property on the corner of this land believing it was not to be built upon,” said Kevin Hurd.

Gilroy summed up the sentiments of the neighbors: “Just because our land use code says a developer can build up to a certain limit, it doesn’t mean we should approve everything right up to that limit.”

An updated site plan will move the first townhome south of Washam Potts Road ten feet further away from the road, but it is unclear if that will satisfy the neighbors concerns.

Also at Monday’s meeting, the commissioners are poised to implement a rare use of the eminent domain process. In order to reduce accidents at the dangerous intersection of Jetton and Old Jetton Road, the town plans to change the Old Jetton Road approach into a right turn only movement.

This can be done by installing a concrete median and signage that will not allow left or straight movements.

In order to install this median, the Town has been seeking to acquire property from Kimco, which owns the Jetton Village (Harris Teeter) Shopping Center. However, the town and Kimco have been unable to agree on the property acquisition. The town board will vote up or down to start the eminent domain process.

The meeting starts at 7pm in Town Hall.

2 Comments

  1. P McD February 3, 2020 at 10:38 pm

    The Town of Cornelius and council put on a great show, they made the local Washam Potts residents feel that they may have some say in the development in the past 3 meetings.

    I find it funny that the Developer, the real estate agent, lawyers can get all the time they want but the residents are pressured to get what they have to say out in less than 3 minutes.

    In the end the Town did what they were supposed to do by who they obviously work for, the developer. They approved the plan and put a developers right to make money comes before the property owners around the development.

    There was 1 Town Council member that spoke his mind and was against the proposed plan but it was quite obvious to all in attendance at the Town Hall Meeting that he was ignored by the other Council members. At least there is one council member that has a backbone and shame on the rest. The next Town Council Election can’t come soon enough.

  2. Rex Butler February 5, 2020 at 12:50 am

    There was no showdown. The vote was already in. Commissioners waited politely while neighbors took their allotted three minutes.
    The lie the planning board lives with is the density. The property is 6.82 acres so if you build 27 townhomes gives you a density of right at 4 per acre which is consistent for the area. However, 2.4 acres are wetlands and unbuildable. If you subtract the wetlands, now you only have 4.42 acres to build on and the density shoots up to in illegal 6.1 units per acre. When I mentioned this I got two answers. First, they said, “Well, if we subtract the streets and sidewalks as unbuildable…” or “This is the recognized practice of accepting the parcel size not the buildable area”. The first response is, of course, preposterous. No one is asking you to deduct area for things that exist in every neighborhood. When the recognized way of doing something is wrong then you need to stop doing it. by this rule, if you bought a 50-acre parcel you could build 200 townhomes for a density of 4 per acre. If 40 acres were wetlands you could still build 200 units on 10 acres and claim a density of 4 per acre because it was purchased as a single property. That is clearly wrong. Sorry, our hands are tied, there is nothing we can do. We’ve always done it this way. It is an accepted practice. WELL SO WAS SLAVERY UNTIL SOMEONE STOOD UP AND CHANGED IT!

Comments are closed.

related posts

Upcoming Events

Our Partners